|
Government blocks independent inquiry
into fibre-optic deal
November 22, 2006
Opposition Leader Gerry Reid says he is disappointed that government members
refused to pass a motion today calling for an independent inquiry into
government’s decision to give $15 million of taxpayers money to companies with
close ties to Premier Danny Williams.
The motion was introduced by the Opposition this afternoon in the House of
Assembly. It called for the appointment of an independent inquiry with broad and
expansive terms of reference to immediately investigate all the details and
circumstances of the fibre-optic deal.
"The fact that government has blocked an independent inquiry into this deal
once again demonstrates that the premier does not want the public to get the
full story," said Mr. Reid. "If this deal is so squeaky clean, it would be
logical that the premier and his caucus would welcome this independent review as
proof. An independent inquiry would remove any politics from the process, but
obviously this government does not wish to have the books opened for public
viewing."
This is the second time government has refused to allow an investigation into
Cablegate. Last week, the Tory majority on the Public Accounts Committee refused
public hearings into the matter.
"Earlier this week, government released a report by Electronic Warfare
Associates (EWA) that generated more unanswered questions and deeper concerns
regarding this deal. This morning, unlike the media, we had to request a
technical briefing from the Department of Innovation, Trade and Rural
Development. This briefing, in turn, raised even more questions. We now know
that Memorial University does not pay for internet access, as a federal
government agency called Canary provides broadband services free of charge to
the university. This is contrary to what the premier and minister are
proclaiming. In addition, these officials said that the proponents approached
government and said they needed $15 million. Government did not do its due
diligence to verify that the companies involved indeed needed this subsidy.
"The fact that no tender or request for proposals was issued, that a
government commissioned consultant’s report is raising concerns, and that
government officials either cannot answer questions or are providing
contradictory information, all demonstrates the absolute need for an independent
inquiry."
|