|
Liberal Opposition Critic for
the Status of Women and MHA for the District of Cartwright-L=Anse
au Clair, Yvonne Jones, says that the failure of government to
initially consult with seven women=s
groups on implementing the Safer Communities legislation is
disturbing given its implication for what may be other
unsuccessful gender inclusive analysis of public policy within
government.
In response to a question on
the issue of why government had not contacted the seven women=s
groups before the bill was shaped, the Minister of Justice Tom
Osbourne admitted that it was an
Aoversight@.
The department has since been pressured to hold consultations
with these groups to receive their valued input.
Jones says the oversight is
appalling and worrisome for several reasons.
AFirst
of all, it means that current guidelines that are in place to
conduct gender analysis were not applied in the development of
this legislation, which undoubtedly will significantly impact
women and children in the community. It calls into question
just exactly how committed this government is to ensuring that
such analysis is applied to other significant or less
significant policy development issues that affect women.@
The fact that this oversight
comes on the heels of the minister responsible for the status of
women recently coming out to stress the importance of gender
analysis to government is also cause for concern says the
Liberal MHA. She points out that it is ironic that several
gender analysis training sessions were provided this winter to
create greater awareness of this issue.
AThis
blunder underscores just how non-diligent this government is
when it comes to ensuring that the perspectives of women in this
province are valued and integrated into the public policy
process.
AThis
omission also certainly calls into question the leadership role
being provided by the Minister Responsible for the Status of
Women Joan Burke in incorporating the realities of women's lives
and views into the economic and social policy decision-making
process.
AConcerns
were not only raised about the lack of meaningful consultations
during the hasty development of this Act that is intended to
create safer communities, but also about the lack of necessary
resources and supports now available in the communities to deal
with the fall-out from this program.@
Jones also points out that respected community groups such as
Turnings were not only never consulted, but were turned down for
funding by this government. The organization was looking for
$30,000 to help shore up its efforts in tackling crime-related
problems that are increasingly plaguing communities.
|