|
Opposition Leader Gerry Reid calls
government’s proposed energy plan a vague and sketchy document
long on assumptions and promises, yet short on specifics.
Reid was responding to the long-awaited
policy document outlining the province’s energy development
direction. The document entitled “Focusing Our Energy” was
finally unveiled today after government promised to do so during
the past four years.
“This document is no more than a collection
of rehashed government press releases, past campaign promises
and heaps of political clichés,” says Reid, who notes that a
more appropriate name might be a discussion paper and not a
plan, as it includes few details on costs, timelines and
specific directions.”
Reid points out as well that the document
includes no generic royalty regime and only a proposed draft for
a natural gas royalty regime. “Industry has been waiting for
the province to provide a regime of stability and certainty so
they can decide on and proceed with development. These glaring
omissions will ensure only more questions instead of answers.
After all this time and waiting, nothing definitive has been
offered or guaranteed which makes me question whether this might
not be more an opportunistic electioneering strategy. This is
one of the most expensive campaign brochures ever produced by
government.
“Even on environmental issues, the
government’s proposal is weak and flimsy. The pollution
emissions issue at Holyrood, for example, will not even begin to
be addressed at the earliest until 2013 when scrubbers and
precipitators will be installed should a transmission line to
the island from Labrador not proceed.
“This government has made an equity stake in future energy
projects a cornerstone of its rhetoric, but this document
equivocates. The province has set out a 10 per cent equity stake
in future energy projects if necessary, but there is flexibility
for modifications should government choose to negotiate at the
time. That is certainly not a recipe for industry certainty and
stability as many had hoped, nor does it respond to those
looking for the logic of why an equity position is more
beneficial than a royalty regime when other provinces including
Alberta are staying away from such an arrangement.”
|