|
Yvonne Jones, Opposition Labrador Affairs Critic and MHA for the District of
Cartwright - L’Anse Au Clair, says she cannot understand why members of the
Williams government voted today to defeat a Private Members Motion
concerning Labrador benefits related to the development of the Lower
Churchill. "I presented a motion that summarized the expectations of
Labradorians around a possible Lower Churchill development project," said
Jones. "The five points included in the motion were discussed and committed
to by the Premier and his cabinet colleagues during a public forum in Happy
Valley - Goose Bay in October. There were other points I could have included
in the motion, but chose not to because they were not agreed upon and
committed to by the government at that time. With this motion today, I was
sincerely trying to achieve consensus on an important development for
Labrador people. I was very disappointed in the fact that government chose
to politicize the matter and even more disappointed that they were not
prepared to uphold their commitments in the legislature of the province
today.
"In October, the Premier committed and agreed to the provision of
affordable and reliable electrical power to sustain and grow the local
economies of Labrador communities, saying that it needs to be addressed even
before a concluded Lower Churchill Development which could take 10 - 15
years to come to fruition.
"Additionally, the Premier agreed that a Labrador heritage fund should be
established to ensure future investment in Labrador and its people. He
agreed that a fund to address infrastructure needs of Labrador is needed and
said he would be reviewing it. In fact, if government was serious about this
commitment, they could use the $50 million received annually from recall
power to address these needs immediately.
"With respect to meaningful consultation with Labrador aboriginal
peoples, the Premier had indicated in October that discussions were already
ongoing with Innu leaders and that discussions would take place with Metis
once the court case concluded.
"The Premier also agreed with the fact that local procurement and
employment must take priority in a development agreement and that a Labrador
First Policy must be adopted. In fact, he stated in October that this would
be the basis of any deal signed by his government.
"Not only did the Premier commit to addressing environmental concerns
though the environmental assessment process, but he agreed and committed to
providing funds to the Grand River Action Committee to move forward as an
environmental intervener.
"I brought this issue to the House of Assembly this afternoon so that the
rights of Labradorians will be upheld as negotiations progress for the
development of this project. The people of Labrador rightfully expect to be
the primary beneficiaries of this resource development. It is only
reasonable that Labrador receive the maximum benefit from this project
through development of a Labrador Development Fund, and accessible,
available energy.
"The Premier promised that the Lower Churchill would be developed for the
primary benefit of Labradorians, that industrial development in Labrador
would be a priority and that the domestic energy needs of the area would be
fulfilled. The PC government voted today to break those commitments, with no
explanation.
"I will continue to raise these issues in the House of Assembly and I can
assure the government that I do support a deal that is in the best interests
of Labradorians. I am prepared to work with government in good faith to
ensure that there is a Labrador First Policy that includes respect and
inclusion of Inuit, Metis, Innu and all other Labradorians in all
discussions pertaining to this project."
Copy of Motion Debated Today
WHEREAS Labradorians must be the primary beneficiaries of any
development
of the hydro resource on the Lower Churchill River;
AND WHEREAS the Premier promised during the 2003 election
campaign, "We will not develop the Lower Churchill unless the primary
beneficiaries are Labradorians. You have my assurance on that";
AND WHEREAS the government party promised during the 2003
election campaign that, "a Progressive Conservative government will make use
of the hydroelectric potential of the Lower Churchill to promote industrial
development and meet domestic energy demand in Labrador";
AND WHEREAS Labrador communities must have electrical power
which is affordable and reliable to sustain and grow the local economy;
AND WHEREAS Labradorians expect a heritage fund will be
established to ensure future investment in Labrador and its people;
AND WHEREAS there must be respect and inclusion for all of
Labrador's aboriginal peoples - the Innu Nation, the Metis Nation and the
Inuit must be consulted and engaged in meaningful discussions on the
development;
AND WHEREAS local business procurement and local employment
opportunities must be a fundamental part of any plan to develop the project
- a Labrador First Policy must be adopted;
AND WHEREAS environmental concerns must be considered and
addressed through environmental assessments. Labradorians must be provided
with intervenor status;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this House of Assembly calls upon
the Government to ensure that Labrador receive the maximum benefit of the
development of the Lower Churchill Power Project;
AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a deal on the Lower
Churchill not be concluded unless the electrical needs of Labrador are met
and a Labrador Development Fund is established to ensure that Labradorians
are the primary beneficiaries of the export of their hydro electric
resources".
|