|
Judy Foote, MHA for the District of Grand Bank, questions why Fishery
Products International (FPI) is not moving forward with their much-touted
income trust proposal.
In October, FPI stated they would be putting their income trust proposal
on hold until the federal government clarified what changes would be made to
tax regimes related to income trusts. On Wednesday, the Federal Minister of
Finance confirmed that no new taxes would be charged to income trusts in
this country, a decision that made income trusts more attractive to
investors.
"FPI made several commitments to the communities of Fortune, Harbour
Breton and Bonavista in an effort to get legislation changed in the House of
Assembly," said Ms. Foote. "Since that time, the company has not lived up to
any of these commitments. The company first used the excuse that federal tax
laws related to income trusts might change. Now that the federal government
has brought clarity to that issue, they are stating publicly that no
decisions will be made on establishing an income trust before the company
completes its operational review in January. Three communities in this
province are relying on these commitments and it is unacceptable for FPI to
continuously play these games.
"The House of Assembly approved changes to the FPI Act that would permit
the sale of the value-added and marketing division of the company. FPI
received what it wanted from the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, it is
now time for the people of the province to receive what they were promised
in return. It certainly appears that the company used the federal
government’s examination of income trusts as an excuse not to move forward,
but were not expecting clarity brought to this issue in such a short period
of time. As a result, they are now using their operational review as a
stalling tactic while the communities of Fortune, Harbour Breton and
Bonavista are forced to wait for an answer on their future.
"FPI made commitments to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. Instead
of looking for ways to possibly close plants and reduce employment, they
should be honouring their commitments and moving forward with their promised
investments. If the company is serious about establishing their income
trust, now is the time to announce their intentions. Otherwise, I fear this
whole proposal was nothing more than a sham."
|